Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Insurance Australia Group (IAG) is proactively addressing the challenges posed by the current soft commercial insurance market through its Intermediated Insurance Australia (IIA) division. CEO Jarrod Hill has expressed confidence in the division's ability to navigate these conditions, citing a well-balanced business portfolio and strategic operational adjustments. - read more
The Tasmanian Government has announced a significant shift in its strategy to address insurance affordability and availability within the state. Premier Jeremy Rockliff revealed plans to collaborate with insurers, brokers, and reinsurers to develop solutions that effectively tackle these issues. - read more
The Australian Government's 2026 federal budget has earmarked $3.4 million over four years to develop measures aimed at reducing property insurance costs and addressing the issue of unintentional underinsurance. This initiative reflects a growing recognition of the financial pressures faced by homeowners and businesses due to escalating insurance premiums. - read more
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its latest statistics, indicating a significant increase in intermediated general insurance premiums. In the six months leading up to December 31, 2025, premiums placed through intermediaries reached $22.97 billion, up from $21.59 billion in the previous half-year and $22.28 billion in the corresponding period of 2024. - read more
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is actively monitoring the exit of Eric Insurance from the general insurance market. Following the company's voluntary administration, APRA is overseeing the process to ensure that policyholders' interests are safeguarded. This includes facilitating partial refunds of unearned premiums to eligible policyholders who held active policies as of October 18, 2025. - read more
Budgeting is one of the most crucial aspects of running a small trade business. Without a proper budget, it's easy to lose track of your expenses and revenues, leaving you in a financial mess. This can be especially challenging for small trade businesses where margins are often tight, and a minor miscalculation can lead to significant issues down the line. - read more
Tradespeople work hard to earn their income, often facing unique expenses that can impact their bottom line. Understanding and maximizing tax deductions is crucial for minimizing these costs and keeping more of what they earn. By making informed decisions about expenses, tradespeople can significantly reduce their taxable income. - read more
Trades insurance is a type of coverage specifically designed to protect those who work in various trades, such as electricians, plumbers, carpenters, and builders. It encompasses a range of insurance products tailored to address the unique risks and challenges faced by tradespeople in their day-to-day activities. - read more
Insurance is a crucial safeguard for everyone, but for subcontractors, it's essential. In the world of trade professionals, the tools of the trade are more than just pieces of equipment; they are investments into one's livelihood. - read more
Public liability insurance is a type of coverage designed to protect businesses against claims of property damage or personal injury caused by their work. This type of insurance is essential for trades professionals, as it provides financial protection against legal and compensation costs arising from incidents related to their services. - read more
Knowledgebase
Copayment: A fixed amount you pay for a covered healthcare service, usually when you receive the service.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.