Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Recent insurance industry reporting has again put cyber risk in front of small businesses, with a clear message for trade operators: digital exposure is no longer limited to office-based companies. Many electricians, plumbers, builders, landscapers and subcontractors now rely on cloud quoting tools, job management apps, online banking, electronic invoices and customer databases to keep work moving. - read more
The latest catastrophe-focused commentary from Australias general insurance sector has arrived with a practical warning for trade businesses: severe weather is no longer a once-in-a-while planning issue. Storms, floods, hail, bushfire and damaging winds are continuing to influence claims volumes, repair costs, underwriting appetite and premium pressure across the market. - read more
ASICs continuing focus on insurance pricing has delivered another reminder that renewal documents deserve close attention, especially for tradies managing several policies across their business. Recent regulatory action against an insurer over alleged pricing and discount failures reinforces a practical point: the final premium shown on a renewal notice may not always tell the full story about how that amount was calculated. - read more
APRAs latest general insurance data has again highlighted a point many Australian tradies are already feeling at renewal time: a healthier insurance sector does not necessarily translate into simple or immediate premium relief for small businesses. While insurers continue to operate with stronger capital buffers and improved underwriting discipline, the costs sitting behind many policies remain under pressure. - read more
The national ban on engineered stone has shifted from a regulatory headline into a practical operating issue for Australian trade businesses. Since the ban began in July 2024, regulators have continued to emphasise that uncontrolled work with crystalline silica can expose workers to serious and irreversible illness. For builders, stonemasons, kitchen installers, tilers, demolition contractors and renovators, the message is clear: compliance is no longer something to deal with only when a job looks high risk. - read more
Being a tradesperson in Australia comes with its own unique set of risks. Whether you're an electrician, plumber, carpenter, or builder, having the right insurance coverage is crucial for protecting your livelihood and your peace of mind. Without adequate insurance, you could be financially devastated by accidents, theft, or property damage. - read more
Insurance is a critical component for tradespeople in Australia, providing financial protection against a range of risks that can significantly impact your livelihood. Adequate insurance coverage ensures that you are protected against potential liabilities, damages, and unforeseen circumstances that could otherwise lead to substantial financial losses. - read more
Budgeting is one of the most crucial aspects of running a small trade business. Without a proper budget, it's easy to lose track of your expenses and revenues, leaving you in a financial mess. This can be especially challenging for small trade businesses where margins are often tight, and a minor miscalculation can lead to significant issues down the line. - read more
Australian trade businesses may need workers compensation insurance when they hire employees, apprentices, casual workers or certain contractors. Obligations vary by state and territory, so tradies should check the rules before growing their team. - read more
Tradespeople work hard to earn their income, often facing unique expenses that can impact their bottom line. Understanding and maximizing tax deductions is crucial for minimizing these costs and keeping more of what they earn. By making informed decisions about expenses, tradespeople can significantly reduce their taxable income. - read more
Knowledgebase
Underwriting: The process by which an insurer determines the risk of insuring a client and decides the terms of coverage.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.