Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
2
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Published:Friday, 11th Oct 2024 Source: Paige Estritori
Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.
Recent findings from the PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey reveal that Australian insurers are increasingly vulnerable compared to their global counterparts, particularly in areas of risk preparedness. The survey, which gathered insights from 698 insurance executives across 42 territories, indicates that Australian insurers scored 6.6% lower on the Preparedness Index than the global average. This gap underscores the pressing need for the Australian insurance sector to bolster its strategies against emerging threats. - read more
The Australian Medical Association (AMA) has raised concerns about the diminishing value of private health insurance for Australians. In its annual Private Health Insurance Report Card, the AMA highlights that the system is increasingly failing to provide value for money to the approximately 15 million Australians holding private health insurance policies. - read more
The Australian insurance market is witnessing a transformative shift as insurers adopt innovative solutions to address the escalating risks associated with natural hazards. The inaugural Property Catastrophe and Climate Governance Report by Global Insurance Law Connect highlights several key developments aimed at enhancing resilience and closing the protection gap. - read more
The Australian and New Zealand Institute of Insurance and Finance (ANZIIF) has unveiled the finalists for the 21st Australian Insurance Industry Awards, set to take place on Thursday, 21 August 2025, at the Star Event Centre in Sydney. These prestigious awards honour the outstanding achievements of individuals and organisations across the entire insurance value chain, highlighting the depth of talent, innovation, and dedication within the industry. - read more
In a significant regulatory action, Allianz Australia and its subsidiary AWP Australia have been fined $16.8 million for making false and misleading statements. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions imposed the fines following an investigation and referral by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). - read more
Trade insurance is an essential safeguard for subcontractors in Australia. It offers a safety net that protects against the uncertainties and inherent risks in the industry. Whether you're a plumber, electrician, or construction worker, having the right kind of insurance can mean the difference between financial stability and ruin. - read more
Public liability insurance is a type of coverage designed to protect businesses against claims of property damage or personal injury caused by their work. This type of insurance is essential for trades professionals, as it provides financial protection against legal and compensation costs arising from incidents related to their services. - read more
In the world of trades, having the right financial products can make a significant difference in managing your business effectively. Whether you're a plumber, electrician, carpenter, or any other type of tradesperson, financial products such as insurance, loans, and savings accounts play a crucial role in protecting your livelihood and ensuring sustainable growth. - read more
Trades insurance is a type of coverage specifically designed to protect those who work in various trades, such as electricians, plumbers, carpenters, and builders. It encompasses a range of insurance products tailored to address the unique risks and challenges faced by tradespeople in their day-to-day activities. - read more
'
Knowledgebase
Public Liability Insurance: A very broad term for insurance covering liability exposures for individuals and business owners. It provides broad coverage, generally including all exposures for property damage and bodily injury.
