Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Significant Decline in Australian Commercial Insurance Rates Observed

01 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In the first quarter of 2026, the Australian commercial insurance market experienced a notable 12% decline in pricing, as reported by Marsh's latest market index. This trend reflects a continuation of the previous quarter's decrease, signalling a competitive environment driven by abundant capacity and insurer competition. - read more

Australia's Cyclone Reinsurance Pool Achieves $1 Billion in Payouts

01 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Since its launch in July 2022, Australia's cyclone reinsurance pool has surpassed $1 billion in claim payments, marking a significant milestone in providing support to regions vulnerable to cyclonic events. The Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation (ARPC) reports that this total encompasses 20 declared events, with Cyclone Alfred in Queensland accounting for a substantial portion of the claims. - read more

APRA Highlights Need for Improved AI Risk Oversight in Insurance Sector

01 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has recently emphasised the necessity for insurers to bolster their oversight and management of risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI). This directive comes in response to findings that the rapid adoption of AI technologies has outpaced the industry's current risk management frameworks. - read more

Understanding the 4.41% Increase in Private Health Insurance Premiums

23 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Australians are set to experience a significant rise in private health insurance premiums, with an average increase of 4.41% scheduled for 1 April 2026. This marks the steepest hike since 2017, adding to the financial pressures faced by many households. - read more

Australia Faces AUD 4.8 Billion in Insured Losses Due to Extreme Weather in 2025

23 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

In 2025, Australia experienced a dramatic escalation in insured losses due to extreme weather events, totaling AUD 4.8 billion-a staggering 727% increase compared to the previous year. This surge underscores the growing impact of climate change on the nation's economy and the insurance sector. - read more

Click for more Insurance News