Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Emergence Insurance Strengthens Cyber Risk Portfolio with Blue Zebra Acquisition

09 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Emergence Insurance has announced the acquisition of Blue Zebra's cyber insurance portfolio, marking a significant expansion of its cyber risk offerings in the Australian market. This move is set to bolster Emergence's capabilities in providing comprehensive cyber insurance solutions to businesses across the country. - read more

State Government Initiates Bushfire Mitigation Trials in Urban Fringe Areas

09 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In response to the increasing threat of bushfires in urban fringe areas, a state government has commenced trials of new mitigation measures designed to enhance community safety. These initiatives aim to reduce the risk and impact of bushfires on residential communities situated near bushland. - read more

HESTA Announces 12% Reduction in Insurance Fees for Members

25 May 2026: Paige Estritori

HESTA, a prominent superannuation fund in Australia, has unveiled a significant reduction in insurance fees, averaging 12% across all cover types. This initiative, effective from 1 July 2026, aims to provide more accessible and affordable insurance options for its members, including those in the trades sector. - read more

Suncorp's AU$2.4 Billion Reinsurance Deal Strengthens Financial Outlook

25 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Suncorp, a leading Australian general insurer, has secured a substantial reinsurance agreement valued at up to AU$2.4 billion over five years. This strategic move has positively impacted the company's fiscal 2026 growth outlook, resulting in a notable 10% increase in share value. - read more

Zurich's AU$415 Million Acquisition of ClearView Signals Market Consolidation

25 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Zurich Financial Services has announced its agreement to acquire ClearView Wealth, a listed life insurer, for approximately AU$415 million. This acquisition is part of a broader trend of consolidation within the Australian insurance market, following similar moves by other major players in the industry. - read more

Click for more Insurance News