Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

APRA Reports Surge in Intermediated Insurance Premiums

09 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its latest statistics, indicating a significant increase in intermediated general insurance premiums. In the six months leading up to December 31, 2025, premiums placed through intermediaries reached $22.97 billion, up from $21.59 billion in the previous half-year and $22.28 billion in the corresponding period of 2024. - read more

APRA Oversees Eric Insurance's Market Exit

09 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is actively monitoring the exit of Eric Insurance from the general insurance market. Following the company's voluntary administration, APRA is overseeing the process to ensure that policyholders' interests are safeguarded. This includes facilitating partial refunds of unearned premiums to eligible policyholders who held active policies as of October 18, 2025. - read more

Significant Decline in Australian Commercial Insurance Rates Observed

01 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In the first quarter of 2026, the Australian commercial insurance market experienced a notable 12% decline in pricing, as reported by Marsh's latest market index. This trend reflects a continuation of the previous quarter's decrease, signalling a competitive environment driven by abundant capacity and insurer competition. - read more

Australia's Cyclone Reinsurance Pool Achieves $1 Billion in Payouts

01 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Since its launch in July 2022, Australia's cyclone reinsurance pool has surpassed $1 billion in claim payments, marking a significant milestone in providing support to regions vulnerable to cyclonic events. The Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation (ARPC) reports that this total encompasses 20 declared events, with Cyclone Alfred in Queensland accounting for a substantial portion of the claims. - read more

APRA Highlights Need for Improved AI Risk Oversight in Insurance Sector

01 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has recently emphasised the necessity for insurers to bolster their oversight and management of risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI). This directive comes in response to findings that the rapid adoption of AI technologies has outpaced the industry's current risk management frameworks. - read more

Click for more Insurance News