Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

IAG Highlights Climate Change's Role in Rising Home Insurance Costs

08 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Insurance Australia Group (IAG), a leading insurer in the Australian market, has recently raised concerns about the escalating impact of climate change on home insurance premiums. The company warns that Australians should anticipate rising costs, attributing this trend to the increasing frequency and severity of weather events driven by climate change. - read more

Australian Insurers Falling Behind Global Peers in Risk Preparedness

08 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian insurance industry is facing mounting challenges as it falls behind international counterparts in preparedness levels, according to the latest PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey. The findings come at a time when Australian insurers are grappling with multiple simultaneous threats ranging from digital security concerns to regulatory pressures and affordability challenges. - read more

QBE Insurance Faces Market Challenges as Premium Growth Slows

08 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

QBE Insurance Group, Australia's largest insurer by market value, has recently experienced a notable decline in its share price, reaching a seven-month low. This downturn is primarily attributed to a slowdown in the company's premium rate growth during the third quarter of fiscal 2025. - read more

Regulators Call for Immediate Action in Australia's Pension Sector

30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Australia's financial regulators, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), have issued a strong directive to the nation's A$4.5 trillion superannuation industry. They emphasize the urgent need for accelerated preparations to accommodate an estimated 2.5 million individuals expected to retire within the next decade. - read more

IAG Highlights Climate Change's Impact on Rising Home Insurance Costs

30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Insurance Australia Group (IAG), a leading insurer in the Australian market, has raised concerns about the escalating impact of climate change on home insurance premiums. The company warns that Australians should anticipate rising costs, attributing this trend to the increasing frequency and severity of weather events driven by climate change. - read more

Click for more Insurance News