Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Global Insurtech Investments Halve as AI Adoption Rises

01 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The global insurtech sector experienced a significant downturn in funding during the fourth quarter of 2024, with total investments plummeting by 50% to US$688.24 million compared to the previous quarter. This decline marks the lowest annual funding level since 2018, with the total for 2024 reaching US$4.25 billion, a 6% decrease from the prior year. - read more

Australia's Insurance Market Set to Surpass $144 Billion by 2029

01 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian general insurance industry is on a trajectory of significant growth, with direct written premiums (DWP) projected to exceed $144 billion by 2029. This forecast, provided by data and analytics firm GlobalData, indicates a substantial increase from the $94.7 billion recorded in 2024, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 8.8% over the five-year period. - read more

Australian Insurers Report $1.11 Billion Profit Amid Lower Catastrophe Claims

01 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian general insurance industry has reported a net profit after tax of $1.11 billion for the March quarter, marking a significant financial upswing attributed primarily to a reduction in catastrophe-related losses. This performance underscores the industry's resilience and its ability to adapt to fluctuating risk environments. - read more

Australian Insurers Falling Behind in Risk Preparedness

24 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from the PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey reveal that Australian insurers are lagging behind their global counterparts in risk preparedness. The survey, which gathered insights from 698 insurance executives across 42 territories, indicates that Australian insurers scored 6.6% lower on the Preparedness Index compared to the global average. - read more

Rising Home Insurance Premiums in Australia

24 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Australian homeowners are facing significant increases in home insurance premiums, with average rates rising by 16% over the past year. This surge is largely attributed to the escalating frequency and severity of extreme weather events, which have led to higher claims and increased rebuilding costs. - read more

Click for more Insurance News