AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.

However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.

In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.

The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.

While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.

"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.

"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."

The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.

"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.

For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Navigating Rising Premiums and Cybersecurity Challenges in Australia's Insurance Sector

07 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

As 2026 unfolds, Australian insurers are grappling with significant challenges that threaten both their operational stability and the affordability of coverage for policyholders. Key among these are the escalating costs of premiums and the persistent threat of cyber incidents. - read more

Bridging the Gap: Enhancing AI and Cyber Risk Preparedness in Australia's Insurance Industry

07 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent studies have revealed that Australian insurers are trailing their global counterparts in preparedness for artificial intelligence (AI) and cyber risks. This lag poses significant challenges to the industry's resilience and competitiveness. - read more

The Financial Toll of Climate Change on Australian Properties and Insurance

07 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Climate change is exerting a profound impact on Australia's property market and insurance industry. Recent data indicates that increased flood risks have led to a substantial devaluation of properties in vulnerable areas, with some regions experiencing value declines of up to 10%. - read more

ASIC Takes Legal Action Against Budget Direct for Misleading Discounts

30 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated legal proceedings against Auto & General, the parent company of Budget Direct, alleging that the insurer engaged in misleading advertising practices concerning policy discounts. This action underscores the regulator's commitment to ensuring transparency and fairness within the Australian insurance industry. - read more

EML Group's Strategic Acquisition of Guild Insurance

30 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant move within the Australian insurance sector, EML Group has acquired a majority stake in Guild Insurance. This strategic partnership is designed to unlock growth opportunities and accelerate the development of technology and artificial intelligence within the insurance landscape. - read more

Click for more Insurance News